|
|
A Working
Stiff's Manifesto:
A Memoir
by Iain Levison
Reviewed by D. JoAnne Swanson
February 21, 2003
Iain Levison's
story of his life as a wage slave is better characterized as memoir than
manifesto. A Working Stiff's Manifesto, though unflinchingly honest,
is long on job gripes you might overhear around the water cooler, short
on rhetoric and calls to revolution. Levison certainly pulls no punches
when it comes to recounting tales of woe from his many jobs.
Levison claims to have had 42 different jobs so far (30 of which he quit,
nine of which he was fired from, and he can't recall what happened on
the other three). He's worked the "slime line" (a fish processing plant
in Alaska), moved furniture, catered posh parties, driven big rigs. Those
with similar experience will find plenty to relate to here, but the reader
should be warned: Levison's world is a buddy-buddy macho male bonding
kind of place. Levison is unrelenting here, and hardly inclined toward
examining his own biases.
Levison is a decent storyteller, if a rather unreflective one. He leaps
- often very abruptly - from one wild tale to another, keeping the focus
on his gripes, with minimal introspection about, say, how the system affects
job choices under industrial capitalism (at the macro level). Those with
a taste for deeper analysis, or who may be hoping for an exploration of
the role of social, cultural, or economic factors, will be disappointed--Levison
gladly leaves that territory to the philosophers, academics, social critics,
and deep-thinker types. In all fairness, he does display a reflective
impulse or two here and there, but the analysis doesn't delve too deep:
"It wasn't supposed to be like this. There was a plan once, but over
the years I've forgotten what it was. It involved a house and a beautiful
wife and a serviceable car and a fenced-in yard, and later a kid or two.
Then I'd sit back and write the Great American Novel. There was an unspoken
agreement between me and the Fates that, as I lived in the richest country
in the history of the world, all these things would just come together
eventually."
Levison's flippant, thumbing-nose-at-the-world tone permeates the entire
book, even the rare moments of contemplation. In his concluding remarks
Levison admits that having a four-year university English degree has made
him impatient with job hunting, given the few jobs he is able to get.
"It's filled me with a sense of entitlement," he goes on, as if we couldn't
have guessed. Most college students suspect that a liberal arts degree
isn't a fast-track ticket to success, and tailor their expectations accordingly.
Few seem to share Levison's pervasive sense of entitlement. Perhaps more
widespread, albeit less openly acknowledged, is Levison's not-too-subtle
expectation that the rewards for succeeding as a heterosexually inclined
man on the job should include "a beautiful wife." This calls out for a
gender analysis, but it's nowhere to be found. Furthermore, feminists
who may be hoping for a nod or two to the woes of working "pink-collar"
wage slave jobs held by mostly women (such as waitressing or administrative
work) will have to look elsewhere. Levison doesn't pretend to speak for
women's experience of wage slavery, and rightly so, but he alienates his
female readers unnecessarily with wisecracks that smack of misogyny. To
wit:
"I'm as sick of work as the next guy, but I'm still practical enough
to recognize the need for it. Without work, where would all the new breed
of millionaires that I read about in Time magazine get their dry cleaning
done? Who would fix their cars? Who would strip for them when they unload
their trophy wives for the evening and go out for a night on the town?"
The glib tone works best when Levison leaves the sexism aside and sticks
to tidbits that any wage slave can relate to, regardless of gender, such
as when he describes a resume as
"a french term for 'page full of bullshit,' which glorifies three or
four of the last forty-five jobs I've had and ignores the others."
In the same vein, he decides early on in his job-hunting trials that
"…they always want something more than just what the classified ad
tells you. They want a good ass-kissing. I might be capable of it, if
it wasn't demanded of me…she [the manager] thinks I have a bad attitude."
Indeed! Who among wage slaves hasn't felt this way after enduring
a stern reprimand by a boss for something laughably trivial? Most anyone
would end up with a "bad attitude" after enduring day after day of pasting
on customer-friendly smiles.
Levison continues with scornful sarcasm, observing that in restaurant
work
"…shift leaders are the corporate restaurant world's answer to prison
trustees. For an extra fifty cents an hour, you become responsible for
everything, basically performing management functions for cook's pay.
This frees the managers up to do the more important things, like wander
around and look stressed, or sit at a table and wait for the night to
end so they can start in on the hard liquor when there's no one around."
On to drug testing. Levison's opinion is that
"Drug testing is hilarious stuff, the last stand in America's love-hate
relationship with drugs…what drug testing accomplishes is to strike fear
into the hearts of bank tellers, meat packers, assembly line workers,
desk clerks, football players, and fish processors. It's a great eliminator.
The words "WE DRUG TEST" tend to keep out the riffraff, people who know
they'd fail."
Without the constant sarcasm and glibness, this kind of comment might,
reasonably enough, invite further questioning of the status quo in which
drug testing (which Levison admits is completely ineffective) is commonplace.
But questioning the politics of it all is hardly Levison's specialty.
Things get worse later in the book, where the increasingly bitter Levison
comes off as not just flippant, but clueless, snarky, and shockingly insensitive.
For example, he tolerates and fails to discourage the blatant racism and
venomous homophobia of a bunkmate he encountered during his time in Alaska,
a Ku Klux Klan member named Billy. Remarkably, most of Levison's annoyance
with Billy the Klansman focuses on Billy's habit of showering only once
a week. "It's not his politics," Levison quips," it's the way he smells".
Don't count on this author to examine male privilege, racism, sexism,
and homophobia, or to consider how his following the "path of least resistance"
(as Allan Johnson would say) by tolerating Billy's racism, avoids challenging
the very system (industrial capitalist patriarchy) that helps to perpetuate
the deplorable job conditions he complains about. The reader might reasonably
expect Levison to employ those critical thinking skills he supposedly
acquired in college, perhaps even apply them to his own situation. No
such luck.
At one point, Levison attends a sales recruitment meeting, resulting in
a group attempt to suck him into the world of water filter sales. Understandably,
he is put off by the fakery, the false enthusiasm, the likelihood that
any doubts about this "opportunity for financial freedom" he might voice
would likely be dismissed by "corporate blather." So far, so good, until
he reveals his glaring lack of perspective with this hyperbole:
"It is the sales version of a gang rape."
I seriously doubt that gang rape victims would agree.
Most horrifyingly of all, he claims that he wishes he could have the "blinders-on"
approach to his work that he often observes in the people he meets. This
way, he could ignore the importance of what he's doing for money in the
larger scheme of things--he could simply go to work, make money, and go
home, without much further thought about the social or political implications
of his actions.
"It would make everything so much easier," he grumbles with his
usual petulance. "It doesn't matter what you spend the day doing, as
long as you're moving up in the company. Making cars, selling beeswax,
gassing Jews. A job's a job. That's how you move up in the world. Maybe
I'll give it a try."
If I were to give Levison the benefit of the doubt here, I might assume
this was a (feeble) attempt to demonstrate the nonsensicality of a work
situation where it doesn't matter what you do, only what kind of money
you make and/or how you climb the corporate ladder. But the humor leaves
a very sour taste. It's hard not to conclude that Levison already
has his blinders on, morally speaking. It's certainly doubtful that he
has been influenced by the work of, say, C. Wright Mills, Zygmunt Baumann,
Arno Gruen, or Derrick Jensen. Jensen, for example, argues that bureaucracy
and other repressive forces have combined to create a world where people
"just doing their jobs" are capable of committing atrocities with impunity.
The fact that Levison doesn't even attempt to deepen his analysis sufficiently
enough to be appalled by this state of affairs is plenty frightening enough.
Adding the sarcastic reference to Nazi Germany on top of that is appalling
and completely inappropriate.
Story after story of hard-driving gambling and boozing, especially by
the fishing boat workers, accompany the endless sarcasm. These accounts,
too, are hard to take, and Levison doesn't even hint at the tragic element
they have in common. It's understandable what drives these men to the
taverns and such after work--after all, wage slaves need ways to let off
steam--but it's difficult, almost painful, to hear time and again
of how these hardworking men fritter away their hard-earned money. Apparently
they are wholly resigned to their fate as wage slaves, not even entertaining
the faintest glimpse of hope for a way out of the hell-hole. Bit by bit,
they are gambling and drinking away the money that might be saved toward
the eventual goal of future freedom from working soul-killing jobs. It's
not that I'm unsympathetic to their plight, however. If I were in similar
circumstances, I too would probably drink pretty heavily. But it's heartbreaking
to witness one worker after another succumbing to a pernicious catch-22
of full-time work under industrial capitalism: work saps the energy for
making future plans (including saving money), but making future plans
(and saving money) is exactly what might provide an eventual road out
of wage slavery.
Levison eventually resigns himself to a life of drudgery. He seems to
have a special bone to pick with those who've found a way out of the wage
economy, however temporary. One of his favorite targets is Henry David
Thoreau. After snidely quipping that Thoreau's credibility to speak on
topics of self-reliance is strained because he relied on his mother to
do his laundry (applying his quintessentially American "make it on your
own" standard blindly, ignoring the possibility that there may be a healthy
kind of interdependence here), he then proceeds to take Thoreau to task
for the cardinal sin of having an inheritance:
"Go confidently in the direction of your dreams, Thoreau said. Later,
he added that most men live lives of quiet desperation, indicating that
few, if any of us, were taking his advice. Fuck him, he had a trust fund.
Who the hell else but a rich man could afford to spend a summer sitting
by a lake thinking about life?"
Class differences are certainly worth a closer look here, but we won't
get anything that thoughtful from Levison. He seems to prefer spewing
venom toward the well-to-do instead of challenging the status quo. Would
Levison's own wage slavery end if he came upon a sufficent sum of cash,
whereupon the fragmented pieces of his life would all suddenly fall into
place? If only it were that simple! To see this, one need only read biographies
of lottery winners. Levison fails to appreciate the idea that it takes
far more than money to eliminate wage slavery, individually as well as
culturally. Of course, money would definitely be of assistance--but, as
anyone who's inherited money and spent it all wastefully might say, it's
hardly the whole story.
Levison's angry white male adolescent-rebellion biting sarcasm ultimately
falls flat. A Working Stiff's Manifesto: A Memoir is little more
than a good-ol'-boys gripe session, full of hubris and heaps of scorn.
Recommended remedy: Studs Terkel's Working, in savory doses.
(c) Copyright
2003, D. JoAnne Swanson, Creating Livable Alternatives to Wage Slavery.
All rights reserved.
CLAWS rating:1
|